Author Topic: Java again  (Read 4611 times)

Offline x-man

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1129
  • Country: gb
  • Karma: +25/-0
    • View Profile
Java again
« on: October 18, 2013, 08:15:11 AM »
After a problem with IE getting updated to 10 and not being able to backup on a customers machine we backed it down to 9 (where it was) and tried again and still no Java (very latest load). So I had the IT guy put me a VM of XP on the machine and the message in the attachment. Anyone else seen this or know of the problem and whther Mitel are aware?


Offline jrg0852

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 309
  • Country: us
  • Karma: +3/-0
  • Look out for the next tech. because it may be you!
    • View Profile
Re: Java again
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2013, 08:25:07 AM »
See if this fixes it..........................

Offline ralph

  • Mitel Forums Admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5768
  • Country: us
  • Karma: +469/-0
  • Published Author: http://amzn.to/2dcYSY5
    • View Profile
Re: Java again
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2013, 08:30:20 AM »
You can also play with your java security settings.

Ralph

Offline x-man

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1129
  • Country: gb
  • Karma: +25/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Java again
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2013, 08:37:04 AM »
Hi Guys, this has only occoured since IE went to 10 (have backed up successfully before) so I'm not sure its the earlier java problem but it may be. I'll try the revised security settings as well.

Thanks.

Offline lundah

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
  • Country: us
  • Karma: +66/-0
  • Senior Chief Grunt
    • View Profile
Re: Java again
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2013, 09:00:09 AM »
I got the same message yesterday after installing the latest Java update (1.7.45) and then firing up OpsManager (yes, I'm still using it for a very very large customer). Backing down Java at least a release or 2 should get rid of it, but I'm concerned that a future Java update is going to cause me a lot of headaches. Used to be you could have multiple older versions running and the PC would use whatever release was required by the application, but that seems to no longer be the case.

Offline x-man

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1129
  • Country: gb
  • Karma: +25/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Java again
« Reply #5 on: October 18, 2013, 09:24:41 AM »
I think it is time Mitel questioned its use of java for backup/restore purposes. many IT people I speak to look aghast when I tell them I need java to do a simple backup or restore.....more so since the recent vulnerabilities.

Offline ralph

  • Mitel Forums Admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5768
  • Country: us
  • Karma: +469/-0
  • Published Author: http://amzn.to/2dcYSY5
    • View Profile
Re: Java again
« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2013, 10:00:09 AM »
Quote
I think it is time Mitel questioned its use of java for backup/restore purposes.

Exactly!
Or at least give us an alternative.   For example, do a backup to the PBX hard drive and then allow us to dl it via an FTP client.

Ralph

Offline x-man

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1129
  • Country: gb
  • Karma: +25/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Java again
« Reply #7 on: October 18, 2013, 10:37:09 AM »
TBH Ralph, since the FTP is whats being used anyway why can't they just do a backup like they do now and let it be restorable as is since IIUIC the backup file is in the sysro directory tree somehwere and can be downloaded and renamed to use the java stuff so why can't we just 'put' it back in to the required directory and do a restrat or similar? FTP is used so often these days it shouldn't be a problem?

Offline johnp

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
  • Country: us
  • Karma: +67/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Java again
« Reply #8 on: October 20, 2013, 09:41:20 AM »
I'd go further and have it SFTP for security

Offline x-man

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1129
  • Country: gb
  • Karma: +25/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Java again
« Reply #9 on: October 21, 2013, 02:41:25 PM »
So, having looked at the release notes for MCD6 again it appears to say that JRE is no longer required for ESM backups (and I assume therefore retsores...)?

Offline marcolive

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Java again
« Reply #10 on: October 22, 2013, 10:19:18 PM »
You're right x-man! We have 6.0 SP1 here and we don't need java anymore for backups/restores and also CSV imports.

Offline x-man

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1129
  • Country: gb
  • Karma: +25/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Java again
« Reply #11 on: October 23, 2013, 07:19:02 AM »
Which, unfortunately, will not help with those customers who will not pay to go to 6 just so we can backup and restore their systems....quite right as well since many of them do not require the upgrade as they are quite happy with what they have....


 

Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10