Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - edtomfish

Pages: [1] 2
1
Thanks it got me his email address. 

My understanding is that this allows you to import actual mailbox greetings and that's what I'm looking to accomplish.  Correct me if I'm wrong but I dont think there is another way to do this without recording it on the device itself, is there?

2
Thanks TE I was bleary eyed and on a mobile when reading this thread and I see now that those were features being discussed in regards to b_hackbarth's app.  I sent a PM to b_hackbarth but it doesn't look like he's been around here for awhile.  Anyone know if he's still providing this program?


3
I'm looking to upload .WAV's for mailbox greetings - DB Programming is 6.2 but I can't find for the life of me where this is accomplished. 

4
MiVoice Office 250/Mitel 5000 / Re: Remote User
« on: June 14, 2017, 01:04:00 PM »
So the server ports are this specifically:

6801 is Minet-SSL
6802 is Minet-AES
6800 is Minet - (open/unencrypted)

It makes sense that the phone would try the two secure options first and then finally settle on the last one if those options arent setup on the server... so I guess my question is - where on the 250 can i enable SLL and/or AES?  if thats where the phone tries first and if i can get the server to answer there - that might be a workaround to my issue.  because even on my lan the phones are trying 6801. 6802 and finally settling on 6800.  im not sure if im conveying my line of thinking that well.

5
MiVoice Office 250/Mitel 5000 / Re: Remote User
« on: June 14, 2017, 08:41:15 AM »
No dice.  I haven't looked at the traffic but I'm guessing the firewall simply sends the RST flag and the phone keeps trying that port. 

So the little bit of info I've found shows that ports 6800-6802 are for signaling? and that 6801/6802 are for secure and 6800 is open/insecure.  As a work-around, I'm now curious how I can turn on encryption and try to force it to use 6801?

6
MiVoice Office 250/Mitel 5000 / Re: Remote User
« on: June 14, 2017, 12:04:04 AM »
As backwards as it sounds it makes sense.  I'm excited to try this tomorrow.

7
MiVoice Office 250/Mitel 5000 / Re: Remote User
« on: June 13, 2017, 09:24:25 PM »
Still convinced the ISP is the issue.  The issue seems to be packets being modified (sounds slightly crazy) enough that the phones aren't functioning properly.  I've captured traffic at a few different points in the path between server and phone and here is what I have:

The following packet samples from 4 different points between phone server and remote phone...  (.46 is my public where the phone is, .157 is the public of the server, .106 is the phone private)

From the phone server:
19           0.396725000       10.0.0.210            xx.xx.xx.46         TCP        60           6801→6920 [RST, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=0 Len=0
 
From our internal firewall:
5275       2.655164              xx.xx.xx.157       xx.xx.xx.46         TCP        54           6801→6944 [RST, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=0 Len=0
 
From the Spirit Adtran:
14           35.041900634     xx.xx.xx.157       xx.xx.xx.46         TCP        64           6801→6988 [RST] Seq=1 Win=0 Len=0
 
From the phone in my home office:
107         70.391494000     xx.xx.xx.157       192.168.0.106     TCP        60           6801→6924 [RST] Seq=1 Win=0 Len=0
 
 

For comparison, here is what the traffic looks like at the phone when the phone is connected to another Mitel server at a different location using a different ISP:
132         59.471738000     xx.xx.xx.243                192.168.0.106     TCP        60           6801→6996 [RST, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=0 Len=0


So the best I can tell - when 6801 isn't open the phone tries 6802, when 6802 isn't open, it goes to 6800 where the connection works.  This is how these phones behave on the LAN too.   

So the issue is now with the packets ... being sent from the server with BOTH THE ACK and RST flags set all the way until they leave my firewall.  Looks like after they leave the ISP adtran they lose the ACK flag and only the RST flag is sent and this is all the reaches the phone.  I don't know, but I'm assuming that the phone is looking for an ACK, RST before attempting the next port.

This is my theory and I'm having a great time trying to convince the ISP.

8
MiVoice Office 250/Mitel 5000 / Re: Remote User
« on: May 26, 2017, 02:42:41 PM »
..on top of that the router is the only thing I can guarantee hasn't been changed.  I can't say same for the mitel box or ISP gear.

9
MiVoice Office 250/Mitel 5000 / Re: Remote User
« on: May 26, 2017, 02:01:50 PM »
Leaning towards ISP now except they are saying nothing.  Apparently close to the time when remote phone went down there was a complete voice outtage.  Router is a watchguard FYI. 

10
MiVoice Office 250/Mitel 5000 / Re: Remote User
« on: May 26, 2017, 12:57:25 PM »
Port forwards are setup as they were 2 years ago when this was originally installed and working. 

As far as I can tell anyway.  Trying to get a look at the traffic there.  The logs show the forwarding is ok.


11
MiVoice Office 250/Mitel 5000 / Re: Remote User
« on: May 26, 2017, 12:08:05 PM »
So I got the phone connected fine to another 250.

I captured its traffic and what it does: 

Tftp ok
Tries port 6801 no answer
Tries port 6802 no answer
Tries port 6800 connection made, phone works


Compared to the one we're having issues with the phone
Hits tftp ok. Then it tries 6801 no answer from the server and just Kees trying over and over. 

Why is the phone trying the next two ports on one server (and working) but not another?

12
MiVoice Office 250/Mitel 5000 / Re: Remote User
« on: May 26, 2017, 07:50:04 AM »
I appreciate your thoughts here... sometimes its just nice to know someone is listening, lol.

I cant get any phone to working outside the office.  Tried 3 different phones at 3 different locations.

The phone works on the LAN perfectly (first thing tried)

Gateway is good.  It can communicate outside fine.  Proof of this is that it can TFTP (UDP port 20001) with the phones just fine.

The only difference I'm seeing is that all the internal phones are using port 6800 and anytime outside they are wanting to use 6801 and those packets aren't being heard by the server. 

The problem might NOT be 6801 not being open on the system, but if thats the case the problem is the phones using 6801 and not 6800.

The only thing I have NOT done is tried this phone on another 250 which I'm trying to work out...mainly because I want to see what that traffic looks like compared to what I'm seeing now.

13
MiVoice Office 250/Mitel 5000 / Re: Remote User
« on: May 25, 2017, 01:55:21 PM »
I don't see any local traffic attempting 6801, or any external's trying to use 6800.


14
MiVoice Office 250/Mitel 5000 / Re: Remote User
« on: May 25, 2017, 01:53:20 PM »
I just did this actually and was coming back to follow up!

So the packets are making it in to the LAN.  Looking at the capture, the local phones are communicating via 6800 which is OPEN.  The external phones are communicating (trying to) on 6801 and that port is closed.  I see the packets come in and RST ACK.

15
MiVoice Office 250/Mitel 5000 / Re: TCP / PCAP Dump
« on: May 24, 2017, 07:49:09 AM »
Thanks TE.

Pages: [1] 2