Mitel Forums - The Unofficial Source
Mitel Forums => Mitel MiVoice Business/MCD/3300 => Topic started by: Ray B on May 10, 2010, 10:28:55 PM
-
Incoming SIP calls from DN@anonymous.invalid fail.
Incoming SIP calls from anonymous@anonymous.invalid work fine.
The controller is running MCD 4 SP1, SIP carrier is Paetec Dynamic SIP.
-
Hi Ray B,
Can you paste your SIP Peer profile information?
-
I've masked the range of DID's and IP addresses for the privacy and security of the customer.
SIP Peer Profile Label Network Element Registration User Name Address Type Interconnect Restriction Maximum Simultaneous Calls Outbound Proxy Server SMDR Tag Trunk Service Zone Alternate Destination Domain Enabled Alternate Destination Domain FQDN or IP Address Enable Special Re-invite Collision Handling Private SIP Trunk Route Call Using To Header Default CPN CPN Restriction Public Calling Party Number Passthrough Use Diverting Party Number as Calling Party Number User Name Password Confirm Password Authentication Option for Incoming Calls Allow Peer To Use Multiple Active M-Lines Enable Mitel Proprietary SDP Force sending SDP in initial Invite message Force sending SDP in initial Invite - Early Answer NAT Keepalive Prevent the Use of IP Address 0.0.0.0 in SDP Messages Renegotiate SDP To Enforce Symmetric Codec Repeat SDP Answer If Duplicate Offer Is Received RTP Packetization Rate Override RTP Packetization Rate Special handling of Offers in 2XX responses (INVITE) Suppress Use of SDP Inactive Media Streams Session Timer Build Contact Using Request URI Address Disable Reliable Provisional Responses Enable sending '+' for E.164 numbers Ignore Incoming Loose Routing Indication Use P-Asserted Identity Header Use P-Preferred Identity Header Use Restricted Character Set For Authentication Use To Address in From Header on Outgoing Calls
Paetech b7d5f9c0-1dd1-11b2-872a-08000f38bb15 (NNN)NNN-NNNN-(NNN)NNN-NNNN IP Address: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 1 16 0 11 1 No No No No (NNN)NNN-NNNN No No No No Authentication No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No 0 No No 1800 No Yes No No No No No No
-
Ray,
Please don't take offence, but the way that post came out it takes a LOT of work to decipher. Any chance you could clean it up a bit?
-Chak
-
The issue has been resolved, the problem didn't occur on the previous load (rel 9) On rel 10 (it seems) I needed to add the incoming DID range to the SIP Peer Profile Assignment by Incoming DID.