Mitel Forums - The Unofficial Source

Mitel Forums => MiVoice Office 250/Mitel 5000 => Topic started by: bmcgonigle on February 04, 2020, 11:22:46 AM

Title: Extend Mitel 5000 System Across VPN
Post by: bmcgonigle on February 04, 2020, 11:22:46 AM
We're in the process of extending our Mitel 5000 system across a site to site VPN but there are some questions with what I hope are easy answers. Setup is currently as such:

Mitel 5000 controller in HQ (192.168.1.xxx)
Domain Controller in HQ is handling DHCP for phones at HQ. 192.168.1.0/24
Site to Site VPN to branch office with NAT and voice QOS configured
Domain Controller in branch location handling DHCP. 192.168.4.0/24

We are using 5330e IP phones for deployment.

Questions:
How should the IP phones be configured with static info?
What should the QOS tolerances be?

Thanks for any insight on this.
Title: Re: Extend Mitel 5000 System Across VPN
Post by: Tech Electronics on February 05, 2020, 07:07:36 AM
bmcgonigle,

Why wouldn't you just use the DHCP from the DC at the remote site for the IP Phones? All you need to do is setup a Voice VLAN and let the DC issue out DHCP to those phones with option 125.

As for QoS over layer 2 it would be 5 or 6 depending on your switch; cisco=5, HP=6. Then for Layer 3 it needs to be 46 or whatever Expedited Forwarding is for your Layer 3; I believe that hex is 128.

Thanks,

TE
Title: Re: Extend Mitel 5000 System Across VPN
Post by: bmcgonigle on February 06, 2020, 01:50:28 PM
Thanks for the feedback and direction. I'll do some research on the vlan/opt 125 setup. The unit in the branch office is a SMB server so I hope it allows for this configuration.

Another question: with regards to the routing of the PC ip through the phone, would this cause conflict with anything?

Thanks again,
Title: Re: Extend Mitel 5000 System Across VPN
Post by: Tech Electronics on February 06, 2020, 02:03:01 PM
bmcgonigle,

The PC port on the Phone only works on the Native VLAN of the port on the switch it is attached to; no routing conflicts between VLANs.

Thanks,

TE